US “FINALLY” BOMBS SYRIA, NOW WHAT?
It was September 9th, 2013 when then
private citizen and business mogul Donald Trump tweeted,” Don't attack Syria -
an attack that will bring nothing but trouble for the U.S. Focus on making our
country strong and great again”. Now, this seemingly innocuous tweet clearly
becomes of a particular importance today in 2017 as its author is now President
of the United States and has gone against what he previously advocated.
Following reports that the Syrian regime used
chemical weapons on its people, resulting in 80 dead, President Trump ordered cruise
missiles attacks in retaliation on the Syrian military base of Al Shayrat where
the chemical weapons attack is believed to have originated. This marked the
first time that the US military deliberately targeted forces loyal to Assad.
Previously, the US military had been conducting surgical airstrikes, targeting
the Islamic State.
Russia, which has been propping the Assad regime
since 2015, condemned the American response calling it “a violation of
international law”. Although the U.S. military’s response does not constitute
in itself an entry into the Syrian conflict, it does make for an interesting
dynamic. President Trump has campaigned on the idea that strained relations
with Russia ought to be repaired. However, this latest assault on the Syrian
airbase represents a minor step back from his intended policy of rapprochement
with Russia. Also, what the missile strikes on the Syrian airfield demonstrated
is that President Trump is less constrained and more willing to act to punish
Assad’s mishaps. This would likely lead to an increase in Russian support for
the Syrian regime.
Nevertheless, a direct confrontation between Moscow
and Washington appears unlikely and talks of WWIII should be dismissed
completely. The complexity of the situation, exemplified by the numerous
factions fighting each other in Syria serve to prevent just that. In the
absence of a clear US policy in Syria, there appears to be no end in sight for
the now six year old conflict.
No comments:
Post a Comment