Russian
President Vladimir Putin doesn’t have many friends in Europe (or elsewhere) at
the moment. His annexation of Crimea and aggressive posturing towards Ukraine
has been roundly denounced by NATO,
the EU, and, as a UN
General Assembly resolution condemning the annexation as illegal demonstrated,
basically everyone. The U.S. and the EU responded to Russian actions in Crimea
with (admittedly limited) sanctions
against key Russian government officials and Putin allies. While this is
perhaps not particularly newsworthy on the American end, for the EU it is an
important step forward – the EU is more vulnerable to Russian retaliatory
action given their significantly more prominent economic and political ties.
More significantly, on Thursday, the European
Parliament called on the EU to prepare economic sanctions in the event that
the crisis deepens. This would represent a huge challenge for the now-28 member
union to pull off, since the EU and Russia are closely intertwined economically
(for example, 19 of 27
EU countries in 2012 had trade deficits with their partner to the east).
That’s not to say that the Russian leader is completely
without allies to the west. As a
recent Economist article pointed
out, the populist far right in Europe has, over the course of the crisis,
largely down on his side. These forces include France’s National Front, Italy’s
Northern League, the UK’s Independence Party, and the Dutch Freedom Party –
political parties with nationalist, anti-EU, and, according to critics,
xenophobic platforms, members, and leaders. A few years ago, an alliance
between Putin and these groups would have been troubling but not necessarily
worthy of much concern. This may not be the case today.
Marine Le Pen
Marine Le Pen’s National Front (Front
National en français), for example, has just had a – if not wildly
successful – definitely very strong electoral showing in mayoral elections, winning
in 11 towns and cities at the end of March. Running on a platform that leverages popular
frustration with the European Union and takes advantage of President François
Hollande’s unenviable approval ratings, her party’s success alarmed France’s
more mainstream parties (the UMP and the Socialists) and European observers
alike. The problem is not so much the rise of the National Front itself as it
is the extent to which this success is illustrative of a swing to the political
far right across Europe. With continent-wide European Parliament elections
coming up in May, the far
right is gunning for the EU – Le Pen at the head of the charge.
The European Parliament building
What are the implications of this development for the
evolution of the Ukraine crisis? Admittedly, few truly consequential effects
are foreseeable in the immediate-term. The European Parliament is not the
strongest or most important institution in the EU, despite its gradual
expansion of powers and responsibilities. Additionally, even if Le Pen’s
far-right alliance manages to significantly expand its hold (30%
is one figure being tossed around, although that’s likely at the high end
of forecasts), mainstream, pro-European parties will retain the majority. But a
strong showing by this group will do little to discourage Putin from further
escalation, and may very well encourage it. Europe’s
far right and the Russian premier share several political stances –
skepticism about immigration, strong feelings of nationalism, concerns
regarding Islamic extremism, and, perhaps most importantly, a distaste for the
EU and its close ties with the U.S. The rise of groups espousing such views
does not bode well for transatlantic efforts aimed at more or less containing
Putin.
This is illustrated by a few choice examples from recent
weeks. The Russian government
invited far-right European parties (including the National Front and the
Austrian Freedom party) to observe the Crimea referendum – a referendum that
the EU had declared invalid. Individual far-right party officials from France and Hungary,
doubling as observers, condoned the vote, noting that it appeared to conform
to international norms. Marine Le Pen recognized the results.
Leaders of a number of right-wing parties in Europe have expressed
explicit support for Putin and his position on Crimea and Ukraine while
simultaneously blaming
the EU for fomenting the crisis in the first place. Le Pen made waves when
she traveled
to Moscow earlier this month and used the opportunity to accuse the EU of
launching a new Cold War with Russia. In addition, she expressed support for
the “federalization” of Ukraine (a proposition rejected by most European
governments). Incidentally, she has also expressed opposition to any economic sanctions
against Russia. Such actions and rhetoric can only serve to exacerbate the
situation and inspire Putin to go further – as would the increased legitimacy
that success in the May elections could bring.
This situation must look rather encouraging to Putin as he
contemplates his next move. While, as noted earlier, any success the far-right
might achieve in May will have little (if any) immediate effect, a strong
showing may very well send Putin a political message he’d be only too happy to
receive: his friends are on the rise. Such an outcome will also complicate
calculations and negotiations within the EU (as well as within individual
member states) as leaders attempt to develop and sustain policies opposing the expansionism
of the behemoth to the east. The EU may become slower and more hesitant in
responding to Russian aggressions, emboldening Putin to take more risks.
Looking ahead, the most significant threat (which is not to
say the most likely threat) would be for all of these groups to gain a
significant foothold in or even control of their national governments. In 2011,
for example, Le Pen stated that if her party won the 2012 presidential
election, France would
withdraw from NATO and form a special partnership with Russia (keep in mind
that France only became
a full member of NATO in 2009, when it rejoined the military command).
While this is not a position shared by all or even most of Europe’s far-right
parties, it would be a severe blow for the Alliance in its efforts to contain
Russia. More generally, the rise of any group that seeks to weaken Brussels
(which here can mean NATO or the EU), can only serve to strengthen Putin’s
position and resolve. However unlikely such events are, they certainly serve as
complicating factors in Europe’s efforts to respond to and curtail current and
potential Russian aggression.
No comments:
Post a Comment