Much has been made of Sec.
Tillerson’s recent speech elaborating upon President Trump’s “America First”
foreign policy. Critics allege it makes a grave error by divorcing American
values from US foreign policy. Supporters suggest that it represents a bold new
era of American confidence and power. Both miss the mark by attributing any
sort of strategic or ideological coherence whatsoever to the Trump
administration.
Critics of “America First” hear
echoes of Lindbergh, and darkly suggest the phrase indicates fascist sympathies.
While “America First’s” checkered past doubtlessly helps sell it to the shadier
parts of Mr. Trump’s base, it must be noted that Trump only started using
“America First” after it was used to describe his foreign policy in an
interview. Mr. Trump, it must be noted, was not aware what the interviewer was
referencing, nor that he was doing so in a negative fashion. While parts of the
Trump administration identify as part of a global far-right, Trump himself
lacks the intelligence and discipline for a coherent ideology. Thus, so far as
the President remains the final arbiter of his administration’s values, the
Trump administration does not stand for much internationally beyond anti-trade
sentiments and an inchoate hatred of Mexicans.
Supporters of Trump’s policies
see a hardnosed realpolitik. This is delusional. The Trump administration has
stayed silent as Russia interfered in the electoral process of the United
States and its allies. The US Navy has not engaged in a freedom of navigation
operation in the South China Sea since Jan. 20. All the Tomahawks in the world
cannot erase the feeble and supine approach Trump has taken to Moscow and
Beijing. The much-vaunted Taiwan call was not a masterstroke of strategy, it
was the error of an amateur who didn’t know any better, panicked, and
capitulated. The fact that China now feels bold enough to suggest it has a
right to veto who the PACOM commander is speaks volumes as to how strong the
PRC thinks Trump’s America is.
Normally, this would be the part
where solutions would be offered for the problems noted. However, the State
Department and DoD are critically understaffed. Furthermore, the Trump
administration feels no great need to fill these positions, as it desires to
kill the administrative state and replace it with Jared Kushner. Therefore, the
United States cannot be said to possess the tools needed to properly address
the situation, nor can it be realistically expected to in the near future. In
short, we are probably doomed.
No comments:
Post a Comment