As President Trump’s first
term reaches its conclusion and he prepares to run again, his administration focuses
on fulfilling promises from the 2016 campaign. One concrete point is Trump’s goal
to expand the US Navy’s fleet to 355 ships, an ambition confirmed in several subsequent
statements. Congress cemented his aspirations into law in Section 1025 of the 2018 National Defense
Authorization Act.
However, the
possibility of building and maintaining 355 manned ships appears increasingly
impossible given projected budgets and the Navy’s current rate of development. In
the face of an increasingly unachievable goal, many argue that numbers are not
the most important metric. For instance, one way out of the numerical dilemma would
be to change the way that ships are counted. Technology has provided improved
capabilities for unmanned ships; in fact, the Navy has several times attempted
to expand the counting methodology but failed in
the face of congressional opposition. Defense hawks worry that such changes are
merely artifices designed to undercut the Navy.
Some critics
argue that the value placed on numbers is wholly misleading, and that capabilities
of ships could be a better way to measure the quality of the fleet. However,
ship count is more easily understood than fleet capability. Defense hawks cling
to the concept of safety and strength in numbers, and so numerical methodology
remains the ultimate measure of the size and strength of the Navy, to its
detriment.
Criticism and
vacillation within the methodology of ship-counting can seem irrelevant; however,
the Navy’s inability to meet or circumvent the administration’s demand for 355 ships
a worryingly critical failure. Most importantly, by delaying the announcement of the
new FSA until the spring, the Navy missed an opportunity to include
its results in the new 2021 budget and forfeited the ability to reshape the fleet
and meet the standards of the modern national defense strategy. The American fleet
risks losing its superior position the longer it struggles to define technicalities
of how its forces should be structured.
No comments:
Post a Comment